<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The birds of prey and Batjay</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sassylawyer.com/the-birds-of-prey-and-batjay/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sassylawyer.com/the-birds-of-prey-and-batjay/</link>
	<description>There&#039;s no business like law business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 23:35:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikki</title>
		<link>http://sassylawyer.com/the-birds-of-prey-and-batjay/#comment-2540</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://houseonahill.net/?p=3735#comment-2540</guid>
		<description>I also agree to most of the comments posted here. I guess, concepts and forms of literature gradually evolve and change through time. what we considered good and excellent before may be considered questionable now and even criticized. 
We all know that one has his/her own viewpoint on something like for example, a literary work. So a piece of literature may seem to be good to others but then oppositely may be taboo or bad to some. and we can&#039;t do anything about that. 
Let&#039;s just say that, if you yourself find something interesting to read and thinks it is worthwhile reading, then go ahead read. there&#039;s nothing wrong about that but please do take into consideration what others think about that work your reading at but eventually, it&#039;s up to you to belive what is what you think is right. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also agree to most of the comments posted here. I guess, concepts and forms of literature gradually evolve and change through time. what we considered good and excellent before may be considered questionable now and even criticized.<br />
We all know that one has his/her own viewpoint on something like for example, a literary work. So a piece of literature may seem to be good to others but then oppositely may be taboo or bad to some. and we can&#039;t do anything about that.<br />
Let&#039;s just say that, if you yourself find something interesting to read and thinks it is worthwhile reading, then go ahead read. there&#039;s nothing wrong about that but please do take into consideration what others think about that work your reading at but eventually, it&#039;s up to you to belive what is what you think is right. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Filipinayzd</title>
		<link>http://sassylawyer.com/the-birds-of-prey-and-batjay/#comment-2539</link>
		<dc:creator>Filipinayzd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 05:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://houseonahill.net/?p=3735#comment-2539</guid>
		<description>Is literature naturally elitist and meant to be appreciated only by a few? 
 
Is literature a form of snobbery or a concept invented to make a few chosen men sound important? 
 
Oo. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is literature naturally elitist and meant to be appreciated only by a few? </p>
<p>Is literature a form of snobbery or a concept invented to make a few chosen men sound important? </p>
<p>Oo. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen Wenborn</title>
		<link>http://sassylawyer.com/the-birds-of-prey-and-batjay/#comment-2538</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen Wenborn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 17:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://houseonahill.net/?p=3735#comment-2538</guid>
		<description>&quot;What is so objectionable about the use of simple language in literature? Is literature naturally elitist and meant to be appreciated only by a few? Is it what makes it special? Is that what makes it good?&quot; 
Fascinating blog. We had a few souls tell us that our making Shakespeare more accessible (by modernising the language for one of our versions), was, in fact, dumbing down.  We were hoping that we&#039;d be encouraging a new generation to read! So your quote  resounds deep within...... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;What is so objectionable about the use of simple language in literature? Is literature naturally elitist and meant to be appreciated only by a few? Is it what makes it special? Is that what makes it good?&quot;<br />
Fascinating blog. We had a few souls tell us that our making Shakespeare more accessible (by modernising the language for one of our versions), was, in fact, dumbing down.  We were hoping that we&#039;d be encouraging a new generation to read! So your quote  resounds deep within&#8230;&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

