I might as well bestow you with what I would like to call you – an a#1hole, since yo can’t cite any conjecture on my part.

See you next time..

This was what I’ve commented -

“It’s not the Darwin’s evolution theory but the theorists. They’re using the evolution theory to prove that God does not exist. These people have committed frauds just to prove their points (try googling “evolution frauds”).”

The arguments are in the web. It’s not mine. So where is the conjecture on my part?

Reading between the lines? What is that? Ah, you’re reading between the lines and you have your own assumption.

Go figure…

Stay classy kid.

It’s not called assumption, it’s reading between the lines.